The body is lean with no concept explanations Claude already knows; every section (usage, output, timing) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor; not 2 because there is no padded or unnecessary explanation.

Provides a fully executable command with a concrete absolute-path example that is copy-paste ready, matching the 'fully executable code/commands' anchor; not 2 because it is real executable code rather than pseudocode.

This is a simple single-action skill and the action is unambiguous, so per the simple-skills note it scores 3; the operation is non-destructive (mkdir) so missing validation does not cap it at 2.

Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and the one referenced bundle file (scripts/init.sh) confirmed real and correctly pathed, so per the simple-skills note it scores 3; not 2 because organization is clean and the script reference is correctly signaled.

Names concrete actions ('创建标准目录结构和 brief 模板') but does not list multiple specific actions, matching the 'names domain and some actions' anchor; not 3 because no comprehensive multi-action list, not 1 because real actions are present.

Explicitly answers both what ('创建标准目录结构和 brief 模板') and when ('每次接到设计需求时首先调用'), matching the 'clearly answers both what AND when' anchor; not 2 because the when is explicit, not merely implied.

The phrase '每次接到设计需求时首先调用' gives a natural trigger ('设计需求'), but coverage is thin and lacks common variations, matching anchor 2; not 3 because keyword coverage is narrow, not 1 because it uses natural language rather than jargon.

The niche (per-task design workspace setup) is reasonably distinct but the trigger vocabulary is limited, so it could overlap with other design-related skills; not 3 because distinct triggers are few, not 1 because it is not generic.