Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable DB skill body: executable commands for all operations, clear per-work-block workflows with de-dup guards, and clean one-level-deep bundling into real scripts. Weaker on conciseness (inline schemas overlap the init-db.sh DDL) and workflow clarity (no post-write verification or error-recovery feedback loops, which the rubric expects for database operations).
Suggestions
Trim token redundancy: the inline schema tables repeat the DDL already in init-db.sh — keep the semantic notes and state machines inline but reference init-db.sh for column types, and state the init-db path only once.
Add an explicit verification/feedback loop after writes, e.g. after record-investor.sh run check-investor.sh to confirm the record exists, and document recovery when a status transition is illegal or a write fails.
Surface status-transition validation as a checkpoint in the workflow (e.g. reject moves that violate the new→contacted→…→invested / passed state machines) so database mutations are guarded by explicit validation rather than only pre-write de-dup checks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is reference-dense with no concept explanations Claude already knows, but the full column-by-column schema tables duplicate the DDL already in init-db.sh and the init-db path is stated twice (prose + command block), so it could be tightened; it is not a 3 because of that token redundancy, and not a 1 because there is no padding or off-topic explanation. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every script has a copy-paste-ready invocation with all flags, required fields marked ("必填:--name、--type、--firm"), and JSON return formats; all 11 referenced scripts are verified real executable files, matching fully-executable-commands; it is not a 2 because these are complete commands, not pseudocode or abstract guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 使用规则 section gives clear per-work-block sequences with de-dup pre-checks (check-* before record-*), but there are no explicit post-write verification or error-recovery feedback loops, and the rubric caps database-operation workflows at 2 when those are missing; it is not a 1 because the sequence and pre-check checkpoints are genuinely present, and not a 3 because validation feedback loops are absent. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview (schemas, state machines, command catalog, usage rules) pointing to 11 real, one-level-deep bundle scripts signaled by full command paths, with no nested references and easy navigation; scored against the actual bundle structure as the rubric instructs, it is not a 2 because the heavy logic is appropriately split out and references are clearly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |