CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

market-research

开展市场研究、竞品分析、投资人尽调、行业情报,附带来源标注和决策导向的摘要。 当用户需要市场规模估算、竞品对比、基金研究、技术扫描或支撑商业决策的研究时触发。

78

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a lean, well-structured research playbook: distinct triggers, per-mode collection tables with named tools, a TAM/SAM/SOM method, an output template, and a pre-delivery quality checklist. It avoids concept re-explanation and stays actionable throughout.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean body with no concept-explanation padding (it does not explain what market research is) and uses compact tables; every section earns its place and assumes Claude's competence.

3 / 3

Actionability

Concrete per-mode tables of exactly what to collect, named search methods per mode ('smart-search', 'browser-guide'), and explicit TAM/SAM/SOM formulas give copy-paste-ready actionable guidance rather than vague direction.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Quality-gate checklist ('交付前检查') with checkboxes acts as an explicit validation checkpoint before delivery, and research modes are clearly sequenced, matching the level-3 anchor with explicit checkpoints.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the skill is a self-contained, well-organized single-purpose document under ~120 lines, which per the rubric's simple-skills note can score 3 with well-organized sections alone.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and high quality, explicitly covering what the skill does and when to trigger it with natural, distinctive terms. Third-person voice is used throughout with no fluff or over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — '市场研究、竞品分析、投资人尽调、行业情报' plus '市场规模估算、竞品对比、基金研究、技术扫描' — matching the anchor for listing several specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('开展市场研究...摘要') and when via an explicit trigger clause ('当用户需要...时触发'), matching the level-3 example with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'当用户需要市场规模估算、竞品对比、基金研究、技术扫描或支撑商业决策的研究时触发' provides good coverage of natural terms a user would actually say, well beyond the level-2 anchor.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Niche is business/investment research with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; not generic enough to overlap with many skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
TeamWiseFlow/xiaobei
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.