Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable content with executable code and an explicit, validated three-phase workflow. Its weaknesses are length/duplication (two full script templates) and a monolithic structure with no external references for the sizable Screencast material.
Suggestions
Collapse the two full script templates into one canonical template and describe the Screencast alternative as a delta (call swaps) to cut duplication and tokens.
Move the Screencast API comparison table and its template into a references/ file (e.g. SCREENCAST.md) referenced one level deep, improving progressive disclosure for this large skill.
Tighten 'Browser Operation Best Practices' by merging the items that restate 'Common Pitfalls' (e.g. fill() on rich-text editors) to a single authoritative section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence (patchright, CDP, no basic-concept padding), but ~479 lines include two near-complete script templates (manual injection and Screencast) plus helper functions whose duplication could be tightened. Not a level-1 wall of concept-explanation, but not the lean 'every token earns its place' of level 3 either. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready code — complete injectCursor/injectSubtitleBar/showSubtitle/moveAndClick/typeSlowly helpers, full script templates, and a concrete run command (`node demo-script.cjs`). No pseudocode gaps. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Discover→Rehearse→Record three-phase process with an explicit '禁止跳过直接录制' rule, a pre-recording Checklist, and validation/feedback loops (Phase 2 '修正字段映射再重试', the 30s→60s browser-timeout retry ladder). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into headed sections, but no bundle files exist and the whole skill is one ~479-line monolith; full script templates and the Screencast API alternative are inline content that could be split into one-level-deep references. Structure is present but content that should be separate is inline, matching the level-2 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |