Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with a clear, well-gated multi-step workflow. Weaknesses are moderate verbosity in the rationale section and dead doc references that undermine progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add the referenced docs/feishu.md and docs/wecom.md files (or update the paths) so the signaled tutorial references resolve.
Tighten the Chinese rationale block to instruction-only guidance and de-duplicate the WeCom install command and Gateway-restart warning.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and command-driven, but the Chinese rationale section ("飞书 / 企业微信的交互界面体验与功能丰富度都比微信强太多...") adds persuasion rather than instruction, and the WeCom install command and Gateway-restart warning are each repeated. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with concrete argument flags (e.g. the prepare/apply python3 invocations and the WISEFLOW_CONFIRM_* env-var scripts), leaving no ambiguity about what to run. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 12-step "Required Flow" is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (binding check in step 5, redacted-summary confirmation in step 7, apply-only-after-confirmation in step 8, Gateway restart confirmation in steps 9/11) covering a risky config mutation and restart. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is structured as an overview with one-level-deep references to docs and scripts, but the referenced tutorial files (docs/feishu.md, docs/wecom.md) do not exist in the bundle, breaking navigation, while the scripts directory is present. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |