Content
66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable with a well-structured, validated workflow, but it is weakened by inlining API-reference and requirement-building content that already lives in dedicated reference files, and by repeated sections.
Suggestions
Replace the inlined API request/response JSON, capabilities object, and field tables in Phase 2/3 with a pointer to references/api-reference.md, and reference references/requirement-builder.md from Phase 1.1/1.2 instead of restating requirement-building guidance inline.
De-duplicate the MCP availability check (currently stated in '能力边界', 'MCP 可用性检查', Phase 3, and '注意事项') into a single canonical section and reference it elsewhere.
Consolidate the duplicated '关键约束' block (Phase 1.2 and '概念图遍历 → 批量微课堂') and the duplicated local-mode Base URL handling into one location.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and is mostly procedural, but contains noticeable duplication — the MCP availability check appears three times, '关键约束' is repeated verbatim, and local-mode Base URL handling is explained twice. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready guidance: full execute_skill_script invocations with input JSON, API request JSON bodies, field tables, and named MCP tool formats; minor gaps remain in the slightly heuristic MCP-tool identification step. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 1–5 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (health check, feature detection), polling rules, and a manifest-based resume feedback loop for the batch concept-graph operation, plus a 关键约束 checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | api-reference.md and requirement-builder.md exist in the bundle but are never referenced from the body, while API request/response detail and requirement-building guidance are inlined — content that clearly belongs in those separate files is inlined and the references are orphaned. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |