Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, mostly actionable workflow with a sensible step sequence and good validation checkpoints for branch operations. Its main weaknesses are a duplicated reference block and dangling references to files that do not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Remove the verbatim-duplicated "📦 可用资源" block and the orphaned IF-THEN reference, since no such rules exist in the body.
Create the referenced files (references/branch-workflow.md, dev-plan-template.md, mcp-calls.md, tapd-mcp-guide.md) or drop the references so progressive disclosure points to real resources.
Expand Step 4-6 into its individual steps (analyze, generate plan, await confirmation) to restore a clean, sequential workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, but the "📦 可用资源" reference block is duplicated verbatim and a trailing "根据 SKILL.md 中的 IF-THEN 规则" line references IF-THEN rules that are not present, adding padding. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance — `git branch --show-current`, regex `#(\d+)`, `id.substring(2, 10)`, named MCP calls (stories_get/bugs_get/tasks_get), and a template file — with only minor gaps (no example MCP invocation shape). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are sequenced with an explicit blocking validation in Step 1 (branch verification) and a user-confirmation checkpoint before development, but Step 4-6 collapses three steps into a single bullet, slightly blurring the sequence. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body signals one-level-deep references via `skill://` URIs, but the `references/` directory is absent, so the referenced files (branch-workflow.md, dev-plan-template.md, mcp-calls.md, tapd-mcp-guide.md) do not exist — navigation is broken rather than verifiable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |