CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bk-monitor-tapd-dev

根据 TAPD 单据分析开发需求并生成方案。当用户需要开发 TAPD 需求/缺陷/任务时使用。

84

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

89%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-structured skill description that clearly identifies its purpose (analyzing TAPD tickets to generate development solutions) and includes explicit trigger conditions. The main weakness is the somewhat limited specificity about what types of analysis or solutions are generated. The description effectively uses domain-specific terminology (TAPD, 需求, 缺陷, 任务) that creates clear differentiation.

Suggestions

Add more specific actions describing what the analysis includes (e.g., '分析技术方案、评估工作量、识别风险点' - analyze technical solutions, estimate workload, identify risks)

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain (TAPD tickets) and mentions two actions ('分析开发需求' - analyze development requirements and '生成方案' - generate solutions), but lacks comprehensive detail about what specific analysis or solution types are produced.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('根据 TAPD 单据分析开发需求并生成方案' - analyze requirements and generate solutions based on TAPD tickets) and when ('当用户需要开发 TAPD 需求/缺陷/任务时使用' - use when user needs to develop TAPD requirements/defects/tasks).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural Chinese keywords users would say: 'TAPD', '需求' (requirements), '缺陷' (defects/bugs), '任务' (tasks), '开发' (development). These are terms users would naturally use when working with TAPD tickets.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

TAPD is a specific project management tool (Tencent Agile Product Development), making this skill clearly distinguishable. The explicit mention of TAPD tickets, requirements, defects, and tasks creates a distinct niche unlikely to conflict with generic development or documentation skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Implementation

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill is well-structured and concise, providing a clear workflow for TAPD ticket development. Its main weakness is the lack of concrete, executable examples for MCP calls and missing validation/error handling steps for API operations. The progressive disclosure is excellent with clear references to supporting documentation.

Suggestions

Add concrete MCP call examples with actual parameters, e.g., `stories_get(workspace_id='12345678', id='1012345678001234567')`

Include error handling guidance for failed MCP calls (what to do if stories_get returns empty or errors)

Remove the duplicate '可用资源' section at the end of the file

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Content is lean and efficient, using numbered steps and bullet points without unnecessary explanation. No verbose descriptions of what TAPD is or how MCP works - assumes Claude's competence.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides clear workflow steps but lacks executable code examples. The git command and regex pattern are concrete, but MCP calls are referenced abstractly without showing actual call syntax or parameters.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly sequenced with a blocking validation step, but lacks explicit validation checkpoints after MCP calls or error handling for failed API responses. The 'wait for user confirmation' is good but no feedback loop for failures.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to detailed materials (branch-workflow.md, dev-plan-template.md, mcp-calls.md, tapd-mcp-guide.md). Content is appropriately split between overview and reference files.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
TencentBlueKing/bk-bcs
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.