Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a compact, actionable test-writing guide with a solid executable template and run commands. Its weaknesses are a duplicated resources section, absent validation/feedback workflow, and references to files that do not exist on disk.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated '## 📦 可用资源' block so the reference list appears only once, recovering wasted tokens.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the workflow (e.g., '写测试 → 运行 npx vitest run → 修复失败用例 → 重新运行直至全部通过') with a validation checkpoint.
Either create the referenced files under references/ (mock-patterns.md, test-qa.md, test-strategies.md) or remove the broken links, and convert 'skill://' URIs to standard relative markdown links for clear one-level-deep navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with short sections and no over-explanation of Vue/Vitest basics, but the '## 📦 可用资源' block is duplicated verbatim (lines 53-59 and 62-67), which is padding that should be tightened. This fits 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary content that could be tightened' rather than 4's 'minor instances only'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Quotes: executable commands 'pnpm --filter @blueking/chat-x test' and 'npx vitest run src/components/your-component', plus a complete copy-paste TypeScript template with mount/expect. It is a 4 rather than 5 because the '测试分类' list (渲染/Props/事件/Slot) gives only labels with no concrete example per category and only one example test is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill provides a template and run commands but no explicit sequence with validation checkpoints — there is no 'write → run → fix failures → rerun until green' feedback loop, which test-writing benefits from. This matches 'steps present but checkpoints missing/implicit' rather than 4's 'clear sequence with most checkpoints'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers are clear and well-organized, but the three referenced files (mock-patterns.md, test-qa.md, test-strategies.md) do not exist in any references/ directory, the resources section is duplicated, and the 'skill://' URIs are not clearly signaled as one-level-deep navigation. Per the guideline to score against actual bundle structure, broken references cap this at 'some structure, references present but not clearly signaled'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |