Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, highly actionable workflow with strong validation gates and feedback loops and good file-level navigation, held back from a top score mainly by cross-section redundancy that inflates length.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense with no beginner-concept padding and assumes Claude's competence, but it is lengthy (~400 lines) with real redundancy — the tooling.md prohibitions and the 'no workflow' rule are restated across step 1, step 3, step 3-D, and the quality checks, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, executable commands — 'git ls-files -- AGENTS.md **/AGENTS.md', 'bash …/detect-standards.sh --json', 'bash …/harness-verify.sh', 'git rm --ignore-unmatch …', '/graphify .' — plus concrete file trees and decision tables, with only minor gaps where guidance stays rule-based rather than copy-paste. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six steps are explicitly sequenced with a TodoWrite checklist (gen-1…gen-6), and validation/feedback loops are present throughout: the 第五步 self-audit (对账→补检→合并), the 12-item 质量检查, and the hard 'harness-verify.sh … 直到 exit 0' gate with retry-until-pass — fully matching the checklist+feedback-loop anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: a clear reference table maps each file to purpose and 'when to read', references are one level deep and well-signaled, and detail is split into templates/best-practices files; however the body still inlines substantial rule blocks and decision tables, and most referenced paths resolve to the parent skill's bundle rather than this skill's own. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |