Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered process skill: fully concrete MCP orchestration with exact parameters, a DoR validation gate wired into the write-back state decision, feedback loops for failures, and clean one-level reference structure. The only notable issue is mild redundancy around the DoR/v_status rule, plus a minor inconsistency between the description's "规划中" status label and the body's backlog v_status values.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense procedural instruction with no re-teaching of concepts Claude knows (5W1H, BDD details are correctly delegated to references). However, there is minor redundancy: the v_status/DoR rule is restated in §2.4, §2.6, and 产出, and the closing 参考文件 table duplicates the inline reference pointers. Efficient with minor trims possible — anchor 4, not 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable for an MCP-orchestration skill: exact call parameter blocks for stories_get/stories_update (workspace_id, id, with_v_status, v_status, description source), workspace_id priority resolution order, concrete file-naming rules with a 4-row example table, the docs/reqs/ save path with a 5-step flow, and an error-handling table covering all failure modes. Specific examples cover the common cases; not 4 since there are no real gaps in executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear §1 → §2.1–2.6 → §3 sequence processed per-requirement, with an explicit validation checkpoint (DoR 8-item gate in §2.4), a conditional fail-path (keep v_status: backlog, annotate in summary), a retry-once feedback loop on write-back failure, and an iterate-until-satisfied user-confirmation loop (§2.5). Batch operations have validation, so the workflow-clarity cap does not apply; this matches the validate → fix → only-proceed-when-valid anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a process overview pointing to three real, one-level-deep reference files, each clearly signaled inline ("执行前必读") and summarized in a 参考文件 table with purpose and when-to-read columns. Verified all three files exist and the §-cited sections (§一, §二, §四, §五 in clarification-guide.md) match actual headers. Clear overview with well-signaled references — anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |