Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured overview skill with clear diagnostic guidance and good section organization. Its main weakness is that the referenced deeper-reading files do not exist in the bundle, leaving the progressive-disclosure navigation unfulfilled.
Suggestions
Add the referenced files (reference/1-artifact-storage.md and reference/2-bkrepo-task-extension.md) to the bundle, or remove the references if the overview is meant to be self-contained.
Make the validation/diagnostic checkpoints explicit in the quick-guide (e.g., '确认命中的实现类后再继续排查') to strengthen workflow clarity for the branching diagnostics.
Clarify the actionable step after identifying the failure type (e.g., where to look or what to check next), since the current guidance stops at classifying the problem.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized, assuming Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of basic concepts; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete diagnostic branching (区分元数据没落库 / 后端没存成功 / 路径规则错了 / 下载令牌权限错了) and high-signal rules, but as an instruction-only architecture overview it lacks fully executable steps, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present (先判断主线 → 区分问题类型 → 确认实际后端实现), but validation checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit; it is above the 'steps listed, checkpoints missing' anchor but below the explicit-feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-signaled and references one-level-deep files (reference/1-artifact-storage.md, reference/2-bkrepo-task-extension.md), but those referenced files are not present in the bundle, so the navigation structure does not actually resolve. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |