Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean instruction-only guide with a clear 7-step workflow and good routing sections, but it lacks concrete executable detail and the referenced bundle files are missing, weakening both actionability and navigation. As a database/DDL skill it also omits the validation/rollback feedback loops the rubric requires, capping workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/rollback checkpoints to the workflow (e.g., a 'validate DDL on a staging DB → verify backward compatibility → only then apply' step) to satisfy the database feedback-loop requirement and lift workflow_clarity.
Create the referenced reference/1-script-management.md and reference/2-sharding.md (or remove the references) so the signaled navigation resolves to real files, fixing progressive_disclosure.
Include 1-2 concrete examples inline — a script-naming pattern and a minimal index/DDL snippet — to move actionability from directive-level to executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~50-line body is lean and free of concept-explanation padding, with each line offering actionable guidance; slight redundancy between the description and the 适用场景/不适用场景 sections keeps it just off the pristine 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete directives ('先按查询路径设计索引', 'DDL 变更必须走脚本管理') but stays at directive level with no concrete SQL, naming patterns, or index syntax, and the reference files that would supply specifics are absent; matches the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence exists, but this DDL/database skill has no validation or rollback checkpoints (validate→fix→retry); per the database feedback-loop rule, workflow_clarity is capped at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and references to reference/1-script-management.md and reference/2-sharding.md are clearly signaled one level deep, but those referenced files do not exist, so the navigable structure is not realized; sits at the 'structure present but gaps' anchor rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |