CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

git-commit-and-push

通过 BK-CI 仓库约定安全执行本地提交与远端推送,例如根据当前变更生成一句简短提交内容、先展示给用户确认、确认后再 `git commit`,并默认推送到个人 fork 远端而不是主仓库。 当用户要求“帮我 commit / push / 提交并推送代码 / 发到远端”时优先使用。

77

Quality

96%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a lean, fully executable workflow with explicit confirmation/validation checkpoints and guardrails for the destructive commit+push operations. Structure is well-organized with shallow one-level references to sibling skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Assumes Claude's git competence throughout — no padding about what commits/remotes are — and every line is actionable guidance or a guardrail, so each token earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands ("git branch --show-current", "git status --short", "git remote -v", "git push -u <fork-remote> HEAD") plus a worked commit-message example and exact normalization rules.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 12-step numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (preview → user confirm before commit; remote-role identification before push) and error-recovery branches (reject/divergence → stop and confirm), satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single-purpose skill with well-organized sections (适用/不适用/快速指导/高信号规则/关键陷阱/延伸阅读) and one-level-deep 延伸阅读 pointers to related skills; no nested or buried references.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concrete, third-person, and clearly pairs a what-clause with an explicit when-trigger. It is well above the 3-point completeness cap because both halves are present and specific.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "生成一句简短提交内容", "先展示给用户确认", "确认后再 git commit", "默认推送到个人 fork 远端而不是主仓库" — giving comprehensive coverage of what the skill does.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (安全执行本地提交与远端推送, 生成短文案, 先确认, 推到fork) and when ("当用户要求…时优先使用") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases users would say ("帮我 commit / push / 提交并推送代码 / 发到远端") but misses a few common synonyms (e.g. "同步到远端分支") that appear only in the body.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (commit+push defaulting to fork with mandatory confirmation) and explicitly excludes adjacent skills (worktree, PR/Issue workflows), minimizing wrong-skill triggers.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
TencentBlueKing/bk-ci
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.