Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured architecture overview with clear routing to reference files and concrete decision rules. Its main weakness is that the referenced reference files are absent from the bundle, and the workflow lacks explicit validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add the missing reference/1-project-foundation.md and reference/2-project-operations.md files (or correct the path) so the signaled navigation actually resolves.
Add an explicit validation/checkpoint step in the 快速指导 flow, e.g. confirm the question matches the chosen main line before acting, to lift workflow clarity toward 5.
Include one or two concrete lookup commands or exact field/table references (e.g. the T_PROJECT columns) to make the guidance fully actionable rather than conceptual.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet-based overview that assumes competence and never explains what BK-CI or a project is; every line earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides specific decision rules (高信号规则, 关键陷阱) and reference routing, but as an instruction-only architecture skill it stops short of concrete lookup or verification steps, keeping it just below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear triage sequence routes questions to the right reference file, but validation checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit, matching anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level-deep references and a clean overview structure, but the referenced reference/ files do not exist in the bundle, so navigation is only partially verifiable — anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |