Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured meta-skill that models its own principles: high-signal sections, clear do/don't boundaries, and a copy-paste skeleton. It scores high on conciseness and actionability, with only minor organization and checkpoint-explicitness gaps.
Suggestions
Frame the 验收清单 explicitly as a validation gate (e.g. '重构后逐条核对，未通过则回到对应快速指导步骤') to make feedback loops explicit.
Consider moving the 重内容类别 enumeration (line 36-43) into a reference file so the main file stays purely routing+action guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~90-line body is lean, assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what a skill or reference is), and every section (适用场景/不适用场景/快速指导/规则/验收/延伸阅读) earns its place with high-signal guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance — a numbered 10-step 快速指导, a copy-paste 推荐骨架, and an explicit 验收清单 — but most actions are structural directives rather than runnable code, leaving minor gaps for an instruction-only skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 快速指导 gives a clear ordered sequence (确定单一职责 → 写 description → 保留高信号 → 下沉重内容 → 清理遗留字段) and the 验收清单 acts as a checkpoint; no destructive/batch operation requires explicit validate→fix→retry loops, so the cap does not apply, but checkpoints are implicit rather than framed as feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one-level-deep references (00-bkci-global-architecture, ../../HARNESS.md) and a skeleton that pushes heavy content to reference/; no bundle files exist, and the body stays overview-shaped, but a couple of inline lists (重内容类别, 高信号规则) could arguably live in references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |