Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured module router with clear scope, anti-scope, and switch-away guidance, and it avoids teaching concepts Claude already knows. Its main weaknesses are duplicated reference listings and — most importantly — that every referenced detail file is missing from the bundle, so the promised progressive-disclosure layer does not actually exist.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced files (reference/1-ticket-module.md through reference/6-openapi-module.md) in the skill bundle, or remove/repair the links — as delivered, the skill's primary routing action dead-ends.
Deduplicate the reference list: keep the capability→file mapping in one place (快速指导) and have 延伸阅读 reference it or list only the sibling skills (process-module-architecture, 00-bkci-global-architecture).
Add a tie-breaker rule for ambiguous cases, e.g. what to do when a need plausibly belongs to two supporting modules or straddles the supporting/core boundary.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean (short scenario lists, terse rules), but the six-entry reference list is duplicated verbatim in "快速指导" step 3 and "延伸阅读", and aphoristic lines like "边界比细节更重要，先选对模块再下钻" could be tightened — matching anchor 3's mostly-efficient-but-could-be-tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The capability→file routing map ("Ticket：reference/1-ticket-module.md" etc.) and explicit switch-away instructions are concrete, but the core action — opening those reference files — cannot be executed because none of the referenced files exist in the bundle, leaving key details missing per anchor 3; not 4 because executable guidance is incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "快速指导" gives a clear numbered routing sequence (identify capability → open the matching reference → switch to process-module-architecture or the core-module skill when out of scope), matching anchor 4's clear sequence; not 5 because there is no tie-breaker for ambiguous module-attribution cases. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The router structure is well signaled with one-level-deep references, but scoring against the actual bundle shows all six referenced paths (reference/1-ticket-module.md … reference/6-openapi-module.md) are absent and the listing is duplicated, leaving the organization incomplete per anchor 3; not 4 because broken reference paths undermine navigation. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |