Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured routing skill with clear decision logic and concrete per-module routing paths. Its main weaknesses are a duplicated reference list and — more seriously — references to module docs that are not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add the missing reference/1-ticket-module.md through reference/6-openapi-module.md files (or correct the paths) so the signaled references resolve.
Remove the duplicated reference list in 延伸阅读 and link to it once, keeping 延伸阅读 only for cross-skill pointers (process-module-architecture, 00-bkci-global-architecture).
Add an explicit decision checkpoint for ambiguous cases (e.g. 'if the capability could belong to two modules, check X first') to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with short bullets and lists, but the six-file reference list is duplicated verbatim in both 快速指导 and 延伸阅读, which is unnecessary padding; not a 4 because the duplication is a clear tightening target. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete routing directives — per-capability file paths ("Ticket：reference/1-ticket-module.md") and explicit switch instructions ("切到 process-module-architecture") — give mostly executable guidance; not a 5 because the routing criteria for ambiguous cases are advisory rather than copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 快速指导 numbered list lays out a clear decision sequence (identify capability → route to reference → or switch skill), supported by 高信号规则 and 关键陷阱 for edge cases; not a 5 because there is no explicit checkpoint for the ambiguous 'which module' decision itself. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is well organized with clearly signaled one-level-deep references, but the referenced files (reference/1-ticket-module.md … reference/6-openapi-module.md) do not exist in any references/ directory — the references are dangling, which is worse than the 'minor organization gaps' of a 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |