Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is operationally excellent — executable code for every API call, a fixed-order preflight with hit criteria, on-miss recovery paths, and explicit validation feedback loops — making it highly actionable with a crystal-clear workflow. Its weaknesses are redundancy (the createModel guard and model rosters are each repeated three-plus times) and a fully monolithic structure with no reference files despite ~560 lines of material. Tightening the repetition and splitting the API/type/onboarding detail into references/ would lift both trailing dimensions.
Suggestions
State the four legal createModel(provider) values once — in the STOP table — and cross-reference it from the section-B warning and Best Practice #2 instead of re-enumerating all four (plus the wrong-value list) in each place.
Move the Type Definitions, the JS/Node-vs-Mini-Program API comparison, and the Custom Onboarding walkthrough into a references/ file (e.g. references/api-and-custom-onboarding.md) and link to it one level deep, keeping SKILL.md as an overview.
Consolidate the Growth Plan model roster (hy4-preview / hy3 / deepseek-v4.1-flash) into a single authoritative table; it is currently repeated in the preflight table, provider table A, the eligibility note, and Best Practice #4.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is fact-dense (nothing explains concepts Claude already knows), but key material is repeated: the four legal createModel values are fully enumerated in the STOP table, again in the section-B warning ("⚠️ Common Mini Program mistake: writing createModel(\"deepseek\") ..."), and a third time in Best Practice #2; the Growth Plan roster (hy4-preview / hy3 / deepseek-v4.1-flash) appears in the preflight table, table A, the eligibility notes, and Best Practice #4. Time-sensitive specifics ("went offline on 2026-05-31", base library 3.15.1+) sit inline rather than in a consolidated deprecation note. This matches anchor 3 ("mostly efficient but ... could be tightened") better than anchor 4 — the redundancy is more than minor, though none of it is empty padding, which keeps it above anchor 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout: complete callCloudApi payloads for DescribeActivityInfo, DescribeEnvPostpayPackage, DescribeAIModels, UpdateAIModel, and CreateAIModel (with "⚠️ Models is a FULL REPLACEMENT, not incremental" semantics); working generateText/streamText/multimodal code with callbacks and [DONE] termination; a decision table mapping user intent to exact provider/model/actions; and defensive JSON-fence stripping for OCR output. Anchor 5 ("specific examples cover the common cases") is matched — text, streaming, vision, custom endpoints, and error handling are all covered with runnable code. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Mandatory Two-Step Preflight is an explicitly sequenced workflow with fixed order ("① eligibility → ② group readiness. Do not swap the two"), per-step hit criteria ("attendRecords contains at least one entry where activityName === ...", "postpayPackageId starts with pkg_tcb_tokencredits_"), explicit on-miss recovery actions (enable via UpdateAIModel, purchase link, plan enrollment URL), and post-registration validation ("Run DescribeAIModels to confirm the GroupName exists with Status=1"). Error-recovery loops are stated (casing retry on InvalidParameter, "merge the old list + new entries before passing" for the full-replacement footgun) plus a final self-verify checklist (Best Practice 13). This matches anchor 5's "explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery". | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files at all (no references/, scripts/, or assets/), and the entire 557-line skill is inlined in SKILL.md: TypeScript definitions, the JS/Node-vs-Mini-Program comparison table, the custom-onboarding walkthrough, and the full provider/model catalog all live inline. Section headers and the STOP pre-read provide decent in-file navigation, so this is above anchor 2's "minimal structure" — but content that clearly belongs in separate reference files is inline with zero one-level-deep references, which is exactly anchor 3 ("could be better organized ... content that should be separate is inline"). It falls short of anchor 4, which expects most bulk content appropriately split out. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |