Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, executable scenario cookbook with exact SDK shapes, constraints, and security best practices throughout. Its weaknesses are structural: significant duplication of trigger guidance and init boilerplate, and a monolithic single-file layout where scenario/API detail could live in reference files.
Suggestions
Collapse the 'Activation Contract', 'When to use this skill', and 'Summary' sections into one trigger statement — the near-identical guidance currently appears three times.
State the tcb.init({ env }) + app.auth() boilerplate once and drop it from every scenario code block, saving ~25 lines of repetition.
Move the API signature list and the nine scenarios into a references/ file (e.g. scenarios.md) linked one level deep, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with the decision tree for picking a scenario.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core scenario content is tight, but trigger guidance is restated three times ('Activation Contract', 'When to use this skill', 'Summary') and all nine scenarios repeat the identical three-line tcb.init boilerplate. This is more than anchor 4's 'minor instances', but it never explains concepts Claude already knows, so it does not fall to anchor 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every scenario ships complete, copy-paste TypeScript with exact SDK method shapes and parameter fields (getUserInfo destructuring, queryUserInfo platform/platformId examples, createTicket with refresh/expire options), plus concrete constraints (customUserId length 4-32 and allowed characters). The import/require mix in scenarios 7-8 is trivial since CloudBase functions run CommonJS. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'How to use this skill' gives a clear five-step sequence (clarify runtime/responsibility, confirm env and SDK, pick scenario, follow API shapes, consult docs if unsure) and scenarios include try/catch error handling. No explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoints exist (e.g. verify a ticket before returning it), which keeps it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and headers make the file navigable, with clearly signaled one-level-deep sibling references. However, the full API signature list and nine-scenario cookbook are reference-level material inlined in a single 440-line SKILL.md, matching anchor 3's 'content that should be separate is inline' rather than anchor 4's 'most content is appropriately placed'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |