Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable: every scenario ships complete executable TypeScript with exact SDK method names, parameter shapes, and concrete constraints, and the agent-facing workflow is clearly sequenced. Its weaknesses are token efficiency (trigger guidance repeated across three sections and init boilerplate duplicated in every scenario) and structure (a monolithic single-file layout with no bundle split, relying on sibling-skill references that may not resolve).
Suggestions
Collapse the duplicated activation guidance — 'Activation Contract', 'When to use this skill', and 'Summary' each restate the same triggers and exclusions — into one section to cut roughly 60 lines of redundancy.
Show the `tcb.init` + `app.auth()` boilerplate once in Scenario 1 and have Scenarios 2–9 reference it instead of repeating the identical four lines nine times.
Move the nine scenario implementations and the API-signature list into a bundle file (e.g. references/scenarios.md) so SKILL.md stays a lean overview with one-level-deep references, and keep only one or two representative examples inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The scenarios are tight and code-focused, but activation/trigger guidance is stated three times — "Activation Contract" ("Using this skill as the entry point for every auth request", "Provider enable/disable or login console configuration"), "When to use this skill" ("Frontend Web login / sign-up flows... handle those with the auth-web skill"), and the closing "Summary" ("Use this Node Auth skill whenever you need to...") — and the four-line `tcb.init` boilerplate is repeated verbatim in all nine scenarios. This is 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than a 2, since there is no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Quotes: nine complete, copy-paste-ready TypeScript scenarios (e.g. `const { openId, appId, uid, customUserId } = auth.getUserInfo();`, `auth.createTicket(customUserId, { refresh: 3600 * 1000, expire: 24 * 3600 * 1000 })`), an explicit API list with exact signatures (`getEndUserInfo(uid?: string, opts?: ICustomReqOpts)`), and concrete constraints ("Length 4–32 characters", "Allowed characters: letters, digits, and `_-#@(){}[]:.,<>+#~`"). Fully executable guidance covering all common cases; no gaps that would justify a 4. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Quotes: "How to use this skill (for a coding agent)" gives a clear 5-step sequence ("Clarify the runtime and responsibility" → "Confirm CloudBase environment and SDK" → "Pick the relevant scenario" → "Follow Node SDK API shapes exactly" → "If you are unsure about an API... Prefer composing flows from the documented methods"), and scenarios include try/catch error handling. This is a clear sequence with most checkpoints present; not 5 because there are no explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoints or fix-and-retry loops, though none are strictly required since no destructive or batch operations are involved. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has clear section headers and well-signaled one-level references to sibling skills ("Provider setup / publishable key -> `../auth-tool-cloudbase/SKILL.md`"), but no bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories) and all ~440 lines — the API reference section, nine full scenarios, and best practices — are inlined in SKILL.md. This matches the anchor 'content that should be separate is inline'; not 4 because the bulk of the material (per-scenario details) is inline rather than split out, and not 2 because organization and navigation within the file are good. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |