Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured progressive disclosure and a clear agent-facing workflow, but the body itself is a router rather than an actionable guide: all executable code lives one file away, and the activation/use-cases guidance is stated redundantly across three overlapping sections. Tightening the duplication and inlining one minimal copy-paste example would lift both conciseness and actionability.
Suggestions
Consolidate the three overlapping activation sections ("Activation Contract", "When to use this skill", and the duplicated "Do NOT use for" lists) into a single use/don't-use block to remove the repeated guidance.
Inline one minimal copy-paste example in the body (e.g., `wx.cloud.init()` in app.js and reading `event.userInfo.OPENID` in a cloud function) so the skill is actionable without first opening references/extended-guide.md.
State the 'native and automatic, no explicit login needed' point once in Core concepts instead of repeating it in the Activation Contract, Key advantage, How-to-use, and Core concepts sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but carries real duplication: when-to-use guidance appears three times ("Use this first when", "When to use this skill", "Do NOT use for" appears twice) and the claim that auth is "native and automatic" is repeated in nearly every section ("seamless and automatic", "No explicit login API calls needed", "No explicit login required", "Users are automatically authenticated"). This matches anchor 3's 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than anchor 2, since no section explains concepts Claude wouldn't know and the total length is moderate. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The body gives concrete routing — "Use `wx-server-sdk` in cloud functions", "Use `wx.cloud` in Mini Program client code", "For basic user identity in cloud functions, use Scenario 2" — but every executable code example is deferred to references/extended-guide.md, leaving the body itself without a single runnable snippet or command. This sits between anchor 2 (high-level hints, missing steps) and anchor 4 (mostly executable guidance), matching anchor 3's 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "How to use this skill (for a coding agent)" provides a clear 5-step numbered sequence (confirm env → understand flow → pick scenario → follow API shapes → consult docs), with explicit scenario routing and a dedicated testing scenario (Scenario 4) acting as a verification checkpoint. It matches anchor 4's 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present' rather than anchor 5, which requires explicit validate/fix/retry loops, and the destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is guidance, not a batch operation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview that pushes all detailed scenarios and code to a single one-level-deep reference (references/extended-guide.md, verified present, 415 lines, clearly signaled both in "Extended guide" and the reference index), and it explicitly documents a fallback for sibling-skill paths that may be absent. This matches anchor 5's 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' rather than anchor 4, which would require notable organization gaps; the only nit — the reference being listed twice — is trivial. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |