Content
46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is well split between a lean overview and a genuine one-level reference file, but the body itself is padded with two parallel 'when to use / do not use' sections and repeated 'native and automatic' statements, and its step-by-step instructions reference scenarios as being 'in this file' when they were moved to the extended guide. Tightening the duplication and fixing the stale pointer would raise actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Merge the 'Activation Contract' and 'When to use this skill' sections into one routing block — they currently duplicate each other's use-cases and 'Do NOT use for' lists nearly verbatim, and state 'native and automatic' auth behavior only once instead of 3-4 times.
Fix the stale pointer in 'How to use this skill' step 3: change 'Pick a scenario from this file' to point at references/extended-guide.md, where the scenarios now live after the 500-line split.
Add a validation checkpoint to the workflow (e.g. how to verify the injected identity in a cloud function call, and what to do if OPENID is absent), since the current sequence ends at 'consult the official documentation' with no feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body states the same routing and concept information multiple times: "Use this first when" / "Do NOT use for" (Activation Contract) is repeated almost verbatim by "When to use this skill" / "Do NOT use for:", and "native and automatic", "no explicit login", and "identity is automatically available" each appear 3-4 times across "How to use", "Core concepts", and the activation sections. This is noticeably padded — an entire redundant section — though it is domain-specific rather than generic filler. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance exists ("Use `wx-server-sdk` in cloud functions", "Use `wx.cloud` in Mini Program client code", "Ask the user for `env`"), but the body contains no code or API shapes — all executable examples live in references/extended-guide.md — and step 3 says "Pick a scenario from this file" when the scenarios actually live in the reference file, which is a concrete misdirection. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "How to use this skill (for a coding agent)" gives a clear 5-step numbered sequence (confirm env → understand flow → pick scenario → follow API shapes → consult docs), but there are no validation checkpoints or error-recovery feedback loops, and the "Pick a scenario from this file" step points to content that is no longer in this file, leaving a gap in the sequence. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an appropriately-sized overview that delegates the 415-line scenario/code detail to a real, one-level-deep reference (references/extended-guide.md, which itself contains no nested references), signaled both in "Extended guide" and the "Reference index". Minor organization gaps: the reference is listed twice, and the "Pick a scenario from this file" wording predates the split to the extended guide, slightly muddying navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |