Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with clear, validated workflows and copy-paste code, but it is repetitive and inlines substantial detail (RLS SQL, comparison tables) that would benefit from being split into reference files. Consolidating the repeated PG/bucket-existence guidance into a single authoritative section would improve token efficiency.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated PG/bucket-existence and Supabase-parity material into one authoritative section; the same warning appears in common mistakes, the checklist, the local-dev recipe, and two dedicated sections.
Move the RLS SQL block and the Supabase comparison table into a referenced file (e.g. references/pg-rls.md) and keep SKILL.md as an overview.
Trim restatements of the same error codes across multiple sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly actionable but the PG/bucket-existence message is restated 4-5 times across sections and the Supabase-parity analogy repeats, so it needs tightening beyond minor trimming. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready snippets (init, uploadFile, getTempFileURL, deleteFile, downloadFile, RLS SQL, MCP tool JSON calls) covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered workflows (local-dev recipe, bucket-existence prerequisite) include explicit validation checkpoints and a feedback loop that stops frontend editing when STORAGE_NOT_EXIST appears. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At 300+ lines with no bundle files, large blocks that could be split (RLS SQL, the Supabase comparison table) are inlined with no one-level-deep references to offload them. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |