Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable routing entry file with strong progressive disclosure and clear workflow validation. The main weakness is conciseness: the MCP/CLI fallback guidance is repeated across multiple sections and could be consolidated to the single dedicated prerequisite section.
Suggestions
Consolidate the MCP/CLI fallback guidance: state the full procedure once in the 'MCP + CLI prerequisite' section and use brief one-line cross-references elsewhere instead of restating the configure-next-session-and-use-CLI recipe ~5 times.
Tighten the repeated 'if MCP unavailable, use tcb CLI via tooling-fallback.md' reminders in the Workflow, Activation Contract, Global rules, and Engineering constitution to single inline pointers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and commendably avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the MCP/CLI fallback procedure ('if MCP tools are missing, configure MCP for next session and use tcb CLI now, see tooling-fallback.md') is restated roughly five times (lines 38–39, 59, 65, 83, 122–125), which is noticeable verbosity that could be tightened — a 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands and API signatures throughout (npx plugins add TencentCloudBase/cloudbase-plugin, npx mcporter list | grep cloudbase, TCB_SITE=intl, queryEnv(action=list, alias=…, aliasExact=true), manageApps(action="createApp", …), JSON.stringify(result, null, 2)), but these are intermixed with routing directives ('read X skill first') that defer executable detail to child skills — solidly 4, not quite 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-stage workflow (Exploration → Implementation 2a/2b → Close-out) with explicit validation (self-verify via tsc/lint/build/tests + agent-browser, mandatory cloudbase-code-review) and feedback loops (stop after 2–3 failed attempts; serialize-then-retry on write-tool type errors); detailed workflows live in child skills, leaving minor gaps versus the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview entry file with well-signaled, one-level-deep references — all six referenced files (activation-map.yaml, console-links.md, deployment-workflow.md, mcp-setup.md, scenarios.md, tooling-fallback.md) exist under references/ and are indexed in both 'On-demand references' and 'Reference index' sections, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |