Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered router/entry skill: copy-paste-ready commands and exact tool parameters, an explicitly sequenced workflow with mandatory validation and reroute loops, and disciplined one-level-deep progressive disclosure to verified reference files. The only weakness is minor redundancy — a duplicated reference index, a wordy serialization guardrail, and PG/AI routing rules repeated in three places.
Suggestions
Merge the 'Reference index' section into 'On-demand references' — both list the same 7 files, so one annotated list would save tokens without losing the lint-reachability links.
Tighten the JSON.stringify guardrail to a single instruction (e.g. 'Write serialized text (JSON.stringify(result, null, 2)), never raw objects; if a write fails on an object, serialize and retry once') — the current three-clause version repeats the same point.
State the PG-routing and AI-qualification rules once (in the routing table's 'Must check before action' column) and drop their restatement in the 'Low-capability STOP card' and 'Routing reminders' sections, keeping only failure-mode hints that add new information.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and platform-specific throughout (site/env-var tables, exact API names like 'createModel(...) takes a GroupName') with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but it has minor trimmable redundancy: the 'Reference index' section duplicates the 'On-demand references' list, the serialization guardrail repeats itself ('Serialize the object first, then retry once with the serialized text, and make sure the retried call actually passes the serialized string rather than the original object'), and PG/AI routing rules appear three times (routing table, STOP card, routing reminders). It is not a 5 because not every token earns its place, and not a 3 because there is no unnecessary concept explanation or padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable and copy-paste ready: exact commands ('npx plugins add TencentCloudBase/cloudbase-plugin -y --scope user', 'npx mcporter list | grep cloudbase', 'npm i -g @cloudbase/cli'), exact env vars and endpoints ('TCB_SITE=intl' + 'TCB_REGION=ap-singapore', 'https://tcb-api.tencentcloud.com/mcp/v1'), and exact tool invocations with parameters ('manageApps(action="deployApp", ...)', 'queryEnv(action=list, alias=..., aliasExact=true)', 'DescribeEnvPostpayPackage'). Specific values cover the common cases (legal GroupNames 'cloudbase', 'hunyuan-v3', 'custom-<name>'); no gaps found for a router/entry skill, and the rubric's scoring note confirms code absence is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (Step 0 site settlement → Step 0.1 project type → 3-stage workflow) with explicit ordering constraints ('Stage 2a must precede frontend code. Stage 3 is mandatory.'), a mandatory validation close-out ('Run cloudbase-code-review, fix errors, declare done' plus 'Self-verify before claiming done. Static (tsc / lint / build / tests) and runtime (agent-browser...)'), and an explicit error-recovery feedback loop ('After 2–3 failed attempts on the same path, stop and reroute'). The routing table's 'Must check before action' column acts as a per-scenario checklist. Not a 4 because validation checkpoints and reroute loops are explicit rather than having minor gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview/router that splits detail into 7 real, verified bundle files (all cited 'references/...' paths exist on disk), each one level deep and well signaled with when-to-load guidance ('Load only when needed (do not expand this entry)'; 'If MCP is unavailable in this session, follow references/tooling-fallback.md'). Section cross-references were verified to exist ('No npm/npx' section, deployment-workflow.md §5, mcp-setup.md tarball path). The only 2-level hop is a cross-skill pointer ('cloudbase-platform' skill → references/protocols/deployment-share.md) that the body explicitly governs via the standalone-install fallback instruction, so it does not constitute buried nesting. Not a 4 because navigation, signaling, and file placement are all clean. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |