Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered workflow skill: executable commands, explicit validation checkpoints with a CI retry loop, and a clean routing table over real reference files. Its only deductions are deliberate cross-section repetition and the Phase 4 procedure duplicating the worktree-fix reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and free of concept explanations, but several rules are deliberately restated across sections — 'One worktree per issue', the commit format, and 'verify build + test' each appear two or more times (workflow, Git safety rules, Commit conventions, self-check) and could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable commands throughout: 'gh issue create --title "<type>(<scope>): <summary>" …', 'git worktree add ../<repo>-audit-fix-<issue-number> -b fix/<slug>-<issue-number> origin/main', 'cd mcp && npm run build && npm run test', 'gh pr checks <number>'. Placeholders are only where data (issue numbers, scopes) is inherently session-specific. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced phases with explicit checkpoints and feedback loops: user confirmation before creating issues, local build+test verification before each push, CI status check with a 're-enter the worktree, fix, and push again' retry loop, and a final minimum self-check checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A routing table maps every task to a real one-level-deep reference file (all 7 referenced files exist), but Phase 4 inlines a detailed worktree procedure that duplicates references/worktree-fix.md — minor placement/duplication gaps rather than the ideal split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |