Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, instruction-only skill body: clearly phased workflow, concrete taxonomy and routing, and an appropriately split single reference. The main gaps are minor redundancy with the frontmatter description and the absence of a sample finding or example command to pattern-match against.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanations of known concepts, but the 'When to use this skill' bullets and the Routing row partially duplicate the frontmatter description and Phase 1 scope, leaving minor trimmable redundancy at anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths, a five-item mismatch taxonomy, explicit severity branches, and named handoff skills make the guidance mostly executable; however, no example commands or a sample drift finding are provided, keeping it below anchor 5's copy-paste-ready standard. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced phases with a Phase 2 verification step, explicit severity/action branches, and a closing self-check checklist; a re-verification loop after doc edits is only implied, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5. The destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is a read-mostly audit with verification present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-sectioned overview with a single clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/review-scope.md, which exists and holds the scope detail), plus a Routing table for navigation, cleanly matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |