Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strongly actionable, well-sectioned fast-path brief that never wastes tokens teaching known concepts, but it is undermined by redundancy — the same ordering and the zero-cloud-function rule restated three to four times — and by missing explicit validation checkpoints for its database CRUD workflow. The partner-packaging section is inline content that would serve better as a one-level-deep reference.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the pipeline: keep the 'Capability sniff order' as the single canonical ordering and reduce the 'Standard playbook' and 'One-screen partner paste' to cross-references to it; state the zero-cloud-function rule once (Hard rule 2) instead of four times.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint and error-recovery loop to the playbook, e.g. after wiring list + create, verify the newly added record round-trips in the list before reporting the preview URL, and give the fix→retry step for the gateway 401 case (call auth.signInAnonymously() then retry the operation).
Move the 'WorkBuddy / partner packaging notes' section (~30 lines including the host-capability table and paste block) into a separate reference file (e.g. references/partner-packaging.md) and keep a one-line pointer in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | There is no concept-explanation padding (it never explains what CloudBase or BaaS is), but the same pipeline is stated three times — the "Capability sniff order" block, the "Standard playbook", and the "One-screen partner paste" — and the rule "cloud function count for this path = 0" appears four times (Hard rule 2, sniff order step 7, playbook step 6, partner paste). The ~30-line WorkBuddy/partner packaging section is host-integration detail most sessions don't need. This fits "mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened"; it is below anchor 4 because the repetition is more than minor trimmable instances. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance dominates: named MCP tools ("writeNoSqlDatabaseStructure", "queryPgDatabase / managePgDatabase"), SDK calls ("app.database() → db.collection(...).get()/add()/update()/watch(...)", "app.rdb().from(...)"), CLI parity ("tcb db pg …"), and a runnable anonymous-sign-in snippet with error handling. It falls short of anchor 5's copy-paste-ready coverage of common cases because the actual list/create wiring (step 4 of the playbook) is only named, not shown, and some steps like "downloadTemplate" are host-tool references without invocation detail. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear and ordered (numbered playbook 1-6, an explicit "Do not reorder" sniff order, gates like "ask before deploy"), but validation is implicit rather than explicit: there is no "verify the created record appears in the list" checkpoint before reporting the preview URL, and no fix→retry loop for database failures — the "Skipping this yields gateway 401" note is prevention, not recovery. Because the workflow centers on database CRUD operations and the rubric caps workflow clarity at 3 without explicit validation/feedback loops for database operations, this stays at anchor 3 despite the clear sequencing. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so this scores the body's own structure: sections are well organized (Activation Contract, Hard rules, sniff order, playbook, an "On-demand skills" table with clearly signaled one-level-deep sibling references). The gap keeping it below anchor 5 is that the "WorkBuddy / partner packaging notes" section (~30 lines of host-packaging tables and a paste block) is niche operational detail inlined in SKILL.md that belongs in a separate reference file, which is a minor organization gap consistent with anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |