Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a compact, well-structured router that delegates detailed templates to reference files and provides concrete decision criteria and artifact paths. Its main weakness is mild redundancy between sections and a slightly indirect reference hop between the two bundle files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized with only minor instances of over-explanation (the opening line restates the title, and 'When to use' and 'Decision rules' overlap slightly), fitting the 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' anchor rather than a fully tight 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete decision criteria (new/complex/cross-module/risky -> spec; small/low-risk/well-scoped -> no-spec) and concrete paths (references/source-commands.md, specs/<name>/...), with the minor gap that the actual phase templates are delegated to the reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear meta-sequence is given (decide -> read template -> follow phase gates -> place artifacts) with an explicit checkpoint ('do not skip required confirmations when running spec mode'); this is a planning skill with no destructive/batch ops so the 3-cap does not apply, and it falls just short of 5 because detailed checkpoints live in the reference. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references ('Source of truth: references/source-commands.md', 'Command mapping: See references/command-catalog.md'), both verified as real files; kept at 4 because command-catalog.md itself forwards to source-commands.md, a minor organization redundancy short of clean 5-level navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |