Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestrator skill: lean body, concrete decision rules, and verified one-level-deep references that hold the real command templates. The main improvement opportunities are folding the duplicate source pointer into the execution steps and stating the mode-to-command mapping explicitly.
Suggestions
Merge the 'Source of truth' section into Execution rule 1 to remove the duplicate reference to references/source-commands.md.
Replace 'Read the matching command template' with the explicit mapping (e.g. spec mode -> the spec command template, no-spec mode -> the no_spec template) instead of deferring it to the catalog.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint before task execution (e.g. verify requirements/design/tasks documents exist and are user-confirmed before proceeding) rather than relying on 'required confirmations' inside the referenced templates.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no concept explanations ('Prefer spec when work is new/complex, cross-module, risky', 'never `git add` it'), but minor trims are possible: the intro sentence 'This skill standardizes how to choose and execute planning modes' adds little beyond the title, and the 'Source of truth' pointer duplicates Execution rule 1's reference to the same file. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout — explicit decision criteria, real file paths ('references/source-commands.md', 'specs/<name>/...'), and specific repo rules ('never git add it (it is gitignored)'). 'Read the matching command template' defers the mode-to-command mapping to the catalog rather than stating it, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence runs from decision rules to three numbered execution steps, and the confirmation checkpoint is explicitly enforced ('do not skip required confirmations when running spec mode'). This is not a destructive/batch operation so no cap applies; the remaining gap is that phase-gate validation details are delegated to the referenced templates rather than stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references: both 'references/source-commands.md' and 'references/command-catalog.md' exist, the catalog maps commands to source-commands.md, and source-commands.md holds the actual templates with no deeper nesting. Content is appropriately split between overview and references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |