Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered skill body: a gated four-step workflow with explicit completion criteria, a self-check checklist, and clean one-level-deep routing to real reference files. The remaining polish is trimming a couple of rationale clauses and showing the named keyset-pagination/limit patterns concretely.
Suggestions
Add a short keyset-pagination RPC example (or a `.limit()` / `.range()` bounded-query snippet) in step 3, since these patterns are named but never shown.
Trim rationale clauses such as "This keeps Git, development, and production reproducible; the tradeoff is that experiments require a new migration version" to just the behavioral rule (use the versioned applyMigration workflow, no ad hoc schema mutation).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, tight workflow steps, and compact code examples. A few rationale clauses could be trimmed, e.g., "This keeps Git, development, and production reproducible; the tradeoff is that experiments require a new migration version" and the two-sentence intro, which fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: a complete CREATE POLICY example, an idiomatic batched-read TypeScript snippet with error handling ("if (error) throw error"), and a concrete API call (`queryEnv(action="info", envId=...)`). Minor gaps keep it below 5: keyset pagination is named ("an RPC that implements keyset pagination") without an example, and `.limit()` / `.range()` bounding is described but not shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow has explicit validation gates ("**Complete when:**" after every step), error/escalation paths ("marked as an assumption for the user", "raised to the user as an unresolved launch blocker"), and a closing "Minimum self-check" checklist. This matches the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation steps and checklists; validation is present, so the database-operations cap does not apply. Not score 4 because checkpoints are explicit and comprehensive rather than minor-gapped. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Routing table maps each work branch to one of four real, one-level-deep reference files (access-patterns.md, indexes-and-explain.md, schema-and-rls.md, capacity-and-connections.md), all verified present in the bundle and matching their routing descriptions, with the explicit instruction "Load only the references required by the current branch." Clear overview with well-signaled references and easy navigation — the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |