Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clear, actionable, well-sequenced planning workflow with strong templates and explicit confirmation checkpoints. Its main weakness is redundancy across the usage/decision sections and the absence of bundled progressive-disclosure reference files.
Suggestions
Collapse the overlapping 'Activation Contract', 'When to use this skill', and 'Decision rule' sections into a single decision/usage block to remove triplicated criteria.
Move the 'Standalone Install Note' and detailed sibling-skill fallback URLs into a separate references file to keep SKILL.md a lean overview.
Consider extracting the per-phase templates (EARS pattern, task format) into a bundled reference document linked from a concise overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Individual sections are lean and assume Claude's competence, but the decision/usage criteria are restated three times (Activation Contract, 'When to use this skill', and 'Decision rule') and the Standalone Install Note is operational boilerplate. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete artifact paths, a usable EARS pattern with a worked example, a copy-ready task markdown template, and an explicit output-expectations mapping — actionable for a process skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Four phases are explicitly sequenced with confirmation checkpoints ('Only start implementation after the user confirms the task plan') and a feedback loop requiring confirmation between phases. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle reference files exist and there is no nested reference chain, but inline duplicated usage/decision content should be split out and sibling-skill references are external pointers rather than cleanly bundled one-level-deep material. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |