Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable process skill with clear phased sequencing, confirmation gates, and concrete templates. Its main weakness is redundant decision guidance repeated across three sections, which hurts conciseness and organization.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated use/skip criteria: the 'Do NOT use for'/'Minimal checklist', 'When to use this skill', and 'Decision rule' sections overlap heavily — merge them into one decision section to remove redundancy.
Add a brief full example of a requirements.md or design.md artifact so the templates have a concrete end-to-end reference, closing the minor actionability gap.
Add an explicit feedback loop for underspecified or failed phases (e.g., 'If acceptance criteria cannot be made explicit, ask clarifying questions and re-draft before proceeding') to push workflow clarity toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and free of beginner-concept padding, but the use/skip criteria are stated three times — 'Do NOT use for'/'Minimal checklist', 'When to use this skill', and 'Decision rule' — creating noticeable redundancy that could be tightened, fitting the 3 anchor rather than the leaner 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready templates (the EARS pattern, an EARS example, and the markdown task format) plus explicit output file paths, giving mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps (no full example requirements.md or design.md). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four phases are clearly sequenced with explicit confirmation checkpoints ('Get confirmation before moving to the next phase', 'Only start implementation after the user confirms the task plan'), but explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loops are only implicit, capping it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear headed sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled sibling references under 'Then also read'; the duplicated decision guidance is a minor organization gap that keeps it just below the clean-navigation 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |