Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably lean and gives a concrete delegation instruction, but as a workflow it lacks any guidance on sequencing, integrating the two sub-skills' outputs, or structural organization. Adding a brief note on order and expected outputs would raise workflow_clarity and progressive_disclosure.
Suggestions
Specify the order and purpose of the two sub-skills (e.g., run grilling first to refine the plan, then domain-modeling to produce ADRs/glossary), and how their outputs combine.
Add minimal section structure (e.g., a short header) even for a one-line skill so the intent is unambiguous.
Include a one-line expectation of the resulting artifacts (ADR(s) and glossary entries) so the end state is clear.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The entire body is a single sentence ("Call the Skill tool twice, for "grilling" and "domain-modeling".") with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance naming exactly which two Skill tool calls to make ("grilling" and "domain-modeling"), but provides no detail on what to do with the sub-skills' outputs or how to integrate them. Mostly executable with a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A two-step delegation is sequenced ("Call the Skill tool twice"), but there is no guidance on ordering, integration of the two sub-skills' outputs, or any checkpoint. The sequence is present yet checkpoints/coordination are missing. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body references none, which is acceptable for a sub-50-line skill, but the body has no section headers or organization at all — just a single unstructured line. Some structure is present implicitly but it is not well-organized. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |