CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

polish

Final quality pass before shipping. Fixes alignment, spacing, consistency, and detail issues that separate good from great.

82

1.26x
Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

91%

1.26x

Average score across 6 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./archived/legacy-companion/.agents/skills/polish/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with concrete numeric thresholds and a clear workflow, but it is verbose for a single file and the closing checklist repeats earlier content. Splitting detail into reference files or trimming redundancy would improve token efficiency.

Suggestions

Consolidate the closing Polish Checklist with the dimension sections or replace it with a short pointer to avoid duplicating ~20 checklist items already covered above.

Consider moving the detailed per-dimension bullet lists into a reference file (e.g. DIMENSIONS.md) and keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with a quick-start checklist.

Tighten sections that enumerate near-synonymous items (e.g. Edge Cases vs. Interaction States both list loading/error/success) to reduce overlap.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and uses concrete bullets, but at ~191 lines the closing Polish Checklist largely duplicates the per-dimension sections and could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete, executable thresholds throughout ("45-75 characters for body text", "150-300ms", "44x44px minimum", "0.01 chroma", "only animate transform and opacity") give copy-paste-ready guidance.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequence (Pre-Polish Assessment → Polish Systematically → Checklist → Final Verification) with explicit guardrails ("CRITICAL", "NEVER") and a final verification checkpoint anchors the multi-step process.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized, but the skill is a monolithic 190+ line file with no external references; detailed per-dimension checklists that could be split out remain inline.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

60%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific about what it fixes but lacks an explicit trigger clause and leans on terms that overlap with adjacent design skills. Adding a "Use when..." sentence with natural trigger words would raise completeness and distinctiveness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when a feature is functionally complete and ready for a final pre-ship polish pass."

Include natural user-facing terms like "polish", "refine", or "clean up" alongside alignment/spacing/consistency to improve trigger coverage.

Sharpen distinctiveness by framing it as the final pass distinct from frontend-design's up-front design work.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Fixes alignment, spacing, consistency, and detail issues" lists multiple specific concrete actions rather than vague language, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does but provides no explicit "Use when..." trigger guidance, so per the judging guidelines completeness is capped at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like "alignment, spacing, consistency" and "before shipping" are natural, but coverage is incomplete — common variations users would say ("polish", "refine", "clean up") are absent.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Final quality pass before shipping" carves a niche, but the listed concerns overlap with the frontend-design skill it explicitly defers to, so conflict risk remains.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
The-Vibe-Company/companion
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.