Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured overview that effectively delegates detail to one real reference file, with a clear sequenced workflow. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit output-validation checkpoint in the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~20-line body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and delegates detail to the reference; it explains no concepts Claude already knows, fitting the anchor for lean and efficient content. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps give concrete, actionable guidance (fields to extract: "title, desc, items, hierarchy, metrics"; template categories; hard output constraints), but the executable syntax detail and full template list are delegated to the reference rather than included inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence is present with concrete sub-actions, but there is no explicit validation/verification checkpoint on the generated output, leaving a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview that clearly signals a single one-level-deep reference (`references/prompt.md`, which exists and is comprehensive), with content appropriately split for easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |