Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body that names the exact tools to call and gives concrete tool-result handling and rights guardrails. It would benefit from condensing the locale/accent enumeration (either inline or as a reference file) and consolidating its error-recovery guidance into one explicit validate→retry loop.
Suggestions
Condense the locale/accent bullet enumeration (e.g., en-US/en-GB/en-AU/en-IN/en-SG, fr-FR/fr-CA) to representative examples plus a 'use the locale the user names' rule, or move the full table into a reference file, to improve conciseness.
Add a single explicit validate→fix→retry checklist (e.g., in the 'Tool-result handling' section) that consolidates the distributed error-recovery guidance into one sequenced feedback loop.
Consider extracting the locale/accent constraints and rights/copyright guard into a references/ file (e.g., LOCALES.md, RIGHTS.md) to tighten the main SKILL.md and improve progressive disclosure toward a clear one-level-deep structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's intelligence — no padding about what dubbing is, and each section earns its place — but the locale/accent bullet enumeration (en-US/en-GB/en-AU/en-IN/en-SG, fr-FR/fr-CA, es-ES/es-MX) is slightly more than strictly necessary, fitting the 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives fully actionable, specific guidance: named tools (dubbing_generate, dubbing_status, dubbing_download, audio_provider_capabilities) bound to each workflow step plus explicit tool-result handling rules — matching the top anchor for executable guidance; per the rubric, absence of code is not penalized when guidance is this concrete. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step 'Required workflow' with concrete tool calls per step and feedback semantics in tool-result handling (not ready → report without claiming failure; wrong accent → retry), and the destructive-operation validation steps are present (verify source local/intentional, confirm rights, capabilities check, preview-first), so the ≤3 cap does not apply; not 5 because the validate→fix→retry loop is distributed across sections rather than one explicit checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (triage, required workflow, preview-first, tool-result handling, locale constraints, rights guard, output contract) with no nested references; not 5 because at ~100 lines it slightly exceeds the simple-skill line and the locale/accent enumeration is a candidate for extraction into a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |