Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable contract with exact request shapes, exit codes, and explicit failure-label validation checkpoints. It is well-structured and concisely written, with only minor room to externalize the detailed API contract into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — exact request shape, required headers, and exit codes are stated without explaining what an SSE stream or base64 is. A few sentences are long but every token earns its place; minor trimming possible. Not a 5 because a few explanatory sentences (e.g. the rationale paragraphs) could be slightly tighter; not a 3 because there is no padded explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: the exact JSON request body, required `stream: true` and `audio.format: pcm16` fields, the SSE decode-concatenate-WAV procedure, manifest line format, and exit codes (78, 0) are copy-paste ready and cover the common case. Not a 4 because there are no meaningful gaps — the contract is complete and specific. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback: pre-submit lease check emitting `AUDIO_CONFIG_NEEDED` and exit 78, model-capability check emitting `AUDIO_MODEL_UNSUPPORTED`, and post-submission degradation paths with structured replacement slots. The failure labels act as error-recovery feedback loops. Not a 4 because checkpoints are explicit and recovery guidance is present, not merely implied. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (Meta-Skill Entrypoint, OpenSquilla Compatibility Contract, OpenRouter Audio API Contract) with a single real bundle file (`scripts/openrouter_audio.py`, referenced via the entrypoint) and no nested references; lean overview. Not a 5 because the fairly detailed OpenRouter API contract block could arguably live in a separate reference file for a cleaner overview; not a 3 because structure and signaling are already good. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |