Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands and a clear, validated multi-stage workflow, and it practices good progressive disclosure via verified one-level references. It is slightly verbose in the boundary/differentiation prose but otherwise strong.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Decide if this is the right tool' table, 'Boundaries', and 'Differentiation from summarize' sections add modest padding that could be trimmed slightly. It is noticeably above the midpoint anchor but not fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Each of the three stages is given as a copy-paste-ready command with concrete flags (--depth, --round, --print-fetches, --record) and a complete JSON evidence schema, covering the common execution cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Scope→Plan→Iterate (×N)→Compile→Deliver sequence is stated up front, with the plan's `done` flag acting as an explicit validation/termination checkpoint and the 'compile never invents sources' invariant providing a feedback guard. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to references/methodology.md and references/sources.md (both verified to exist), and scripts are kept in a separate scripts/ directory rather than inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |