Content
55%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably lean but undersells the skill: it describes the compile pipeline instead of giving executable guidance and never surfaces the validation feedback loops or the bundled script that actually do the work.
Suggestions
Add a concrete invocation example (e.g., the resolved entrypoint command and the expected stdout line) so the body is actionable on its own.
Surface the validation feedback loops (citation-key/page-count checks) as explicit workflow checkpoints, since this is a batch compile operation.
Explicitly reference scripts/compile.py in the body so the bundle file is clearly signaled rather than only discoverable via the frontmatter.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean heading plus a single short paragraph with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body only describes the flow ('this script runs xelatex / bibtex / xelatex × 2') without any concrete, executable command or example; the actual runnable detail lives in the frontmatter entrypoint and the bundled compile.py rather than in the body. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The compile pass order is named but validation checkpoints are absent from the body, and for a batch compile operation the guidelines cap workflow clarity low; the script's citation/page validation is never surfaced to the reader. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a short, well-organized single-purpose skill under 50 lines with a bundled scripts/compile.py, but the body does not explicitly reference or link to that script, leaving navigation only implicitly handled via the frontmatter entrypoint. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |