Content
37%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is extremely concise but essentially a stub: all actionable content and the multi-step workflow are encoded in the YAML frontmatter rather than the markdown body, leaving the body with no executable guidance or sequenced steps.
Suggestions
Surface a short workflow overview in the body (e.g. intake → clarify → search → strategy → plan) so the sequence is visible without parsing the YAML composition block.
Add at least one concrete, executable example such as a sample read-only diagnostic command or the stop-condition/rollback pattern the skill promises.
Include an explicit validation/checkpoint note (e.g. "confirm read-only checks before any reversible fix; require approval for danger-zone actions") to support workflow clarity for destructive operations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is two lean lines — a heading and "Creates safe, reversible troubleshooting plans for home and small-team IT issues." — with no padding and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body provides no concrete code, commands, or executable guidance; it only describes the skill's intent ("Creates safe, reversible troubleshooting plans") rather than instructing how to do anything. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The markdown body contains no sequenced steps or validation checkpoints; the actual intake→clarify→search→strategy→plan workflow lives in the YAML composition block, which is outside the rubric's body scope. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/) exist and the stub needs none, but the single heading plus one line offers no real section structure to organize — minimal but not monolithic or nested. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 10 / 20 Passed |