Use this meta-skill instead of answering directly when the user needs a concrete migration plan that benefits from multi-skill orchestration across migration classification, authoritative guide lookup, optional repo diff inspection, and step-by-step validation planning.
62
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./src/opensquilla/skills/exp/meta-migration-assistant/SKILL.mdTake a "help me migrate X → Y" request and produce a concrete, runnable checklist. The pipeline does four things:
classify the migration kind via an LLM tag (one of six tokens).
fetch_guide the most authoritative source for THAT migration:
| Classifier verdict | Best source | Routed skill |
|---|---|---|
OPENAI_V0_TO_V1 | repo release notes | github |
PY2_TO_PY3 | framework migration doc | multi-search-engine |
VUE2_TO_VUE3 | framework migration doc | multi-search-engine |
REACT_CLASS_TO_HOOKS | framework migration doc | multi-search-engine |
CJS_TO_ESM | (fuzzy, synthesize) | multi-search-engine |
OTHER (default) | (synthesize) | deep-research |
repo_context optionally inspects the current repo diff only when the prompt indicates that local repository context should shape the migration.
write_plan uses a constrained llm_chat renderer so explicit source
and target terms in the user request remain authoritative even when
repository context or retrieved guide text is noisy.
If the orchestration fails: ask the user to specify the migration tag manually, run the matching skill yourself, then write the checklist.
94ac35e
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.