meta-pre-commit-quality-gate
Run three quality gates (ruff + mypy + pytest) in parallel over the staged diff, then arbitrate a single BLOCK/APPROVE verdict. Use before committing changes locally when you want a comprehensive pre-commit gate beyond per-file linting — exactly the same gate set CI enforces.
69
86%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
SKILL.md’s required runtime workflow passes {{ outputs.collect_staged }} (staged file paths/content) into the sub-agents’ `task` text, and because those staged files can be authored by outsiders (e.g., PR/issue code), their free-form text can be ingested into the LLM context via the “Staged files: --- {{ outputs.collect_staged | truncate(800) }} ---” blocks.
- Repository
- TokenRhythm/opensquilla
- Commit
94ac35e
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.