CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

meta-web-to-pdf-briefing

Render a topic into a distributable PDF briefing in three steps: web search → bullet summary → styled PDF. Trigger when the user asks for a PDF briefing on a single topic.

58

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./src/opensquilla/skills/exp/meta-web-to-pdf-briefing/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise and well-structured with a clear pipeline and a thoughtful failure fallback, plus a useful untrusted-content caveat. It would benefit from a complete render call signature and an explicit verification checkpoint.

Suggestions

Provide the full html_to_pdf_render signature with arguments (e.g., title, html, page_size) so the fallback step is copy-paste executable.

Add a lightweight validation checkpoint, such as confirming the summary is non-empty before rendering and verifying the PDF path exists on the final line.

Parameterize the summarize skill call in the fallback (style, max_words) to match the orchestrator composition.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~20-line body is lean and efficient, assumes Claude's competence, and the one explanatory sentence about orchestrator mechanics is non-obvious runtime detail rather than padding.

5 / 5

Actionability

The fallback gives a concrete call for step 1 with parameters, but step 3 ('Call html_to_pdf_render with the title and summary content') omits the function signature and exact arguments, leaving a key executable gap.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The search → digest → render sequence is clear (and reflected in frontmatter depends_on), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints verifying intermediate outputs before proceeding.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-organized into an overview plus a Fallback section with no bundle files needed; minor gap is that the detailed composition lives in frontmatter rather than the body, but structure is appropriate for this short meta-skill.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, third-person, and clearly states both capability and trigger. It is strong but could broaden trigger-term coverage and add a couple more synonyms to reach the top band.

Suggestions

Expand trigger terms to include natural synonyms like 'PDF report', 'PDF summary', or 'briefing document' so users with variant phrasing land on this skill.

Add a brief 'Use when...' clause listing multiple trigger phrases (e.g., 'Use when the user asks for a PDF briefing, report, or summary on a single topic').

Clarify what the output contains (e.g., length, structure) to lift specificity toward comprehensive coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and three concrete actions — 'web search → bullet summary → styled PDF' — giving several specific steps, but stops short of comprehensive coverage of what the briefing contains.

4 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' (render a topic into a distributable PDF briefing in three steps) and 'when' ('Trigger when the user asks for a PDF briefing on a single topic') are present and explicit, though the trigger is a single phrase rather than a broad set.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The phrase 'PDF briefing' (and 'PDF 简报' in triggers) is a relevant natural term, but common synonyms like 'PDF report', 'PDF summary', or file extensions are absent.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'PDF briefing on a single topic' is a fairly distinct niche with a clear trigger, carrying only minor overlap risk with general PDF-generation skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
TokenRhythm/opensquilla
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.