Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured probe skill that gives Claude a clear output format and example commands without padding. Its main limitation is that the per-line CHECKS/PATCH_TARGETS entries are placeholders rather than concrete, executable guidance, and no verify-retry loop is specified.
Suggestions
Replace the angle-bracket placeholders in CHECKS and PATCH_TARGETS with one or two concrete filled-in examples so Claude has a copy-paste-ready reference, keeping the flexible template as a secondary note.
Add a one-line retry instruction under VERIFY (e.g., 'If verification fails, revise PATCH_TARGETS and re-run VERIFY') to close the validation feedback loop.
Clarify the fallback selection rule with a single concrete default (e.g., 'default to `npm test` and `npx tsc --noEmit`') rather than offering both generic and example phrasings.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean output template plus two short sentences; it assumes Claude's competence and explains nothing Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete output skeleton (LANGUAGE_PROBE/CHECKS/REPRODUCER/PATCH_TARGETS/VERIFY) and example commands like `npm test -- <pattern>` and `npx tsc --noEmit`, but the CHECKS/PATCH_TARGETS lines are placeholder slots rather than fully executable code, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The template implies a clear sequence (checks → reproducer → patch targets → verify) and includes a VERIFY checkpoint, but there is no explicit fix/retry feedback loop for failed verification. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references needed; the code block plus trailing note is well organized and self-contained, matching the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |