Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and appropriately scoped for a simple routing skill — concrete URLs, a clear response workflow, and one-level external references with no nested or missing files. Its main weakness is redundancy: the Core Principles and Quick Reference sections restate the workflow and repeat URLs, inflating token cost without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated docs-map URLs from either Question Routing or the Quick Reference section, keeping each URL in one place, to cut roughly a quarter of the body's tokens.
Drop or fold the 'Core Principles' section into the Response Workflow, since bullets like 'Source everything' and 'Right resource first' restate workflow steps 3-4.
Add a brief error-recovery step to the workflow for when the docs page is unreachable or unclear (e.g., say so explicitly and suggest the user check the linked page) to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 'Core Principles' section ('Accuracy over guessing', 'Source everything', 'Right resource first') largely restates the Response Workflow steps, and the Quick Reference block repeats the docs-map URLs already given in Question Routing ('https://docs.claude.com/en/docs_site_map.md' and 'claude_code_docs_map.md' each appear twice). Mostly efficient but with genuine redundancy to tighten, matching anchor 3 rather than 4's 'minor instances' bar. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance: exact per-product URLs, an explicit routing rule ('Check the docs maps first, then navigate to specific pages'), and a copy-ready fallback phrase ('For the most current information, see [URL]'). Minor gap — no instruction on how to actually fetch or search the doc pages — keeps it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (Identify product → Use the right resource → Verify details → Provide answer with source → If uncertain, direct to docs) with an uncertainty fallback checkpoint. Not 5 because there is no guidance for error recovery when docs are unreachable or contradictory; not 3 because the sequence and fallback are explicit and the skill involves no destructive or batch operations that would require validation caps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and all references are external web URLs that are one level deep and clearly labeled per product, with well-organized sections and easy navigation. It falls short of anchor 5 because the body (~60 lines) slightly exceeds the simple-skill threshold and contains duplicated routing content (Quick Reference repeating Question Routing URLs) that indicates less-than-ideal organization. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |