Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is reasonably lean and the curl fallback ladder is genuinely usable, but its credibility is undermined by two undefined interfaces: a 'fetch_webpage' command that appears nowhere and a 'fetch.sh' script that is not present in the bundle. Combined with a redundant curl section and a contentless example section, the skill gives an agent enough to improvise but not enough to execute confidently.
Suggestions
Remove or actually implement the 'fetch_webpage <url> --method ...' interface — it is neither an existing script nor a documented tool; pick one real entrypoint (curl or a shipped script) and document only that.
Ship fetch.sh in the bundle (e.g. scripts/fetch.sh) or delete the '工具脚本' section, since the referenced file does not exist in this skill directory.
Cut the redundant curl block (the table already lists the URLs) and the empty '示例' section, and replace them with brief failure-handling guidance: what response indicates a service failed and when to fall back to the next one.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The curl block ('curl -s "https://r.jina.ai/https://example.com"' etc.) duplicates the service URLs already given in the table, the '示例' section ('用户: 帮我获取... 助手: (使用 r.jina.ai 获取)') adds no information, and the trailing tagline is filler. Mostly efficient with some unnecessary repetition; not 4 because these trimmable sections are noticeable rather than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The curl examples are executable, but the documented API 'fetch_webpage <url> --method jina|markdown|defuddle' references an interface never defined anywhere, and the referenced './fetch.sh' script does not exist in the bundle. This matches 'Some concrete guidance but incomplete... missing key details'; not 4 because a reader following the primary documented interface would fail. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence exists ('首先用 web_fetch 尝试获取 / 如果失败或被过滤，调用本工具') with a priority-ordered fallback table, but there is no checkpoint for what counts as failure, when to advance to the next service, or how to verify the returned markdown is usable. Sequence present with implicit checkpoints; not 4 because the failure-handling criteria are undefined. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short with clean section headers, but it references a bundle file ('本目录包含 fetch.sh 脚本') that does not exist — there are no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories in this bundle. Structure exists but the one reference it makes is broken and unresolvable; not 4 because a dangling reference to a missing script is a concrete organization defect, not a minor gap. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |