Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, actionable skill body with executable curl examples and a clear service-comparison table. It is weakened by implicit fallback checkpoints between services and a reference to a nonexistent fetch.sh script.
Suggestions
Add explicit fallback checkpoints: define what counts as a failure (empty body, error/HTTP status, Cloudflare challenge page) and instruct trying markdown.new then defuddle.md in sequence only when the prior service fails.
Either provide the referenced fetch.sh script in a scripts/ directory or remove the "工具脚本" section; as written it points Claude to a file that does not exist.
Reconcile the conflicting command interfaces — the "API 格式" block shows `fetch_webpage <url> --method jina|markdown|defuddle` (flags) while fetch.sh is invoked with positional args (`./fetch.sh https://example.com jina`); pick one and document it consistently.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a service-comparison table, copy-paste curl commands, a short API-format block, and a minimal example, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (what curl or markdown is). | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (e.g. `curl -s "https://r.jina.ai/https://example.com"") with specific service URLs, matching the score-3 anchor for executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A two-step sequence is present ("1. 首先用 web_fetch 尝试获取 2. 如果失败或被过滤,调用本工具"), but the criteria for moving between the three fallback services are only implied by the priority table, with no explicit failure checks or checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized for a short skill, but the body references a `fetch.sh` script ("本目录包含 `fetch.sh` 脚本") that does not exist in any bundle directory, making the sole external reference broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |