Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body provides a clearly sequenced, reasonably actionable workflow for WeChat article publishing with good section structure and a useful style guide. Its weaknesses are repeated rules that waste tokens, missing execution details for search and text entry, and the complete absence of validation checkpoints between steps.
Suggestions
Add validation checkpoints after each risky step: verify word count is 3000-5000 before saving, confirm the cover image is applied, and verify the draft appears in 草稿箱 after clicking 保存.
State the no-hashtag rule and the word-count requirement once each (in 注意事项) and delete the duplicated mentions in 禁止事项 and the 功能 list, which restates the frontmatter description.
Make step 1 and step 5 executable: specify how to search for hot topics (concrete query strategy or tool invocation) and how the title and body text are entered into the editor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no concept-teaching padding, but it is tightened poorly: the no-hashtag rule appears three times ('❌ 文章末尾禁止加任何话题标签', '4. **禁止话题** - 末尾绝对不要加任何 #标签'), and the '## 功能' section restates the frontmatter description almost verbatim, matching the 'could be tightened' level-3 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete UI sequences exist ('点击封面区域', '选择 AI配图', '输入封面描述 - 主体+场景+风格') with word-count budgets and a structure template, but key execution details are missing: '使用 web_fetch 搜索主题相关热点信息' specifies no actual search method or query, and how the title/body text is entered into the editor is never stated. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The seven steps ('步骤 1: 搜索热点' through '步骤 7: 保存草稿') form a clear sequence, but there are no validation checkpoints — no word-count verification, no confirmation the cover was applied, no check that the draft actually saved — matching the 'sequence present but checkpoints missing' level-3 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no bundle files present, the ~110-line body is well organized into clear sections (风格参考, 执行流程, 注意事项) that are easy to navigate. It does not reach 5 because the ~40-line Liu Run style guide is inlined content that would sit better in a separate reference file, and the body exceeds the 50-line simple-skill threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |