CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

wechat-article

抓取微信公众号文章,提取标题和内容并输出为 Markdown 格式。支持多种提取方式。

58

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./configs/microservice/bff-service/configs/agent-skills/clawhub/wechat-article/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a compact, well-structured, mostly copy-paste-ready guide for a simple single-command skill, with correct bundle layout and a clear ordered extraction strategy. Weaknesses are minor: a duplicated examples section, an unstated 'requests' dependency, and a named-but-unexplained fallback to browser automation. Overall a strong content file.

Suggestions

Note the 'requests' dependency (e.g., pip install requests) in Usage or the metadata requires block, since the script imports it and it is not in the Python standard library.

Merge the '示例' section into Usage (it repeats the same command) and drop the duplicated '建议优先使用 r.jina.ai' note that restates the strategy list's '(推荐)' marker.

Add one line on what a failed run looks like (exit code / stderr message) and when to fall back to agent-browser, so the stated strategy order is actionable end-to-end.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but there is minor redundancy: the '示例' section repeats the Usage command almost verbatim, and '建议优先使用 r.jina.ai 方式' restates the '(推荐)' tag in the strategy list. This matches 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the every-token-earns-its-place level.

4 / 5

Actionability

The usage command is copy-paste ready with real URL examples and a concrete output sample, and the referenced script (scripts/wechat_article.py) exists in the bundle. It falls short of 5 because the script imports the non-stdlib 'requests' library while neither the body nor the frontmatter metadata mentions installing it — a small but real execution gap.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

As a simple single-command skill the primary action is unambiguous, and the ordered 提取策略 list plus 注意事项 give fallback context. It is not a 5 because the fallback path is only named ('agent-browser - 浏览器自动化(需要处理验证码)') with no instruction on what to do when the script fails, leaving the sequence's error-recovery step implicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external reference files, and the body is organized into clear, well-labeled sections (Usage, 输出示例, 提取策略, 注意事项, 示例). The one bundle file referenced in the body (scripts/wechat_article.py) exists at the stated path, so navigation and structure are fully appropriate for a skill of this size.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does in a distinct, well-bounded niche, but it omits any 'when to use' trigger guidance and lacks natural keyword variations (e.g., 微信文章, mp.weixin.qq.com). The vague trailing claim '支持多种提取方式' adds no concrete information. It is a solid mid-range description that would improve most from an explicit use-when clause.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to scrape or save a WeChat official-account article (公众号文章), such as an mp.weixin.qq.com link.'

Replace the vague '支持多种提取方式' with the concrete methods (r.jina.ai extraction, direct fetch, browser automation) or drop it entirely.

Include natural keyword variations users would actually say — 公众号文章, 微信文章, 公众号链接, mp.weixin.qq.com — to improve trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names a clear domain ('微信公众号文章') and two concrete actions ('提取标题和内容并输出为 Markdown 格式'), matching the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions' anchor. It is not a 4 because '支持多种提取方式' is generic padding that names no actual method, leaving coverage incomplete.

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (scrape WeChat official-account articles, extract title and content, output Markdown), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or any equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines. Not a 4 because 'when' is entirely absent rather than merely imprecise.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'微信公众号文章' and 'Markdown' are relevant keywords a user might say, but common variations are missing — no '微信文章', '公众号链接', 'mp.weixin.qq.com', or English equivalents. This matches 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'; it is above a 2 because the core domain term is natural, not generic.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is highly specific — WeChat official-account article scraping — with virtually no overlap risk against generic web-scraping or document skills. The domain term itself acts as a distinct trigger; a 4 would require residual overlap with closely related skills, which is not the case here.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
UnicomAI/wanwu
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.