Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and clearly structured, with excellent executable examples and a well-defined core workflow. The weaknesses are redundancy (Tips and Common Patterns restate earlier sections) and a monolithic layout that inlines a full command reference instead of splitting it into a bundled reference file.
Suggestions
Delete the Tips section (it duplicates earlier content such as auto-wait behavior, map-before-interacting, and fill vs type) and fold any unique tips into their home sections; also remove the duplicate `vibium screenshot` entry between Reading Content and Capture.
Move the full Commands catalog (Discovery through Session) to references/commands.md and keep SKILL.md to the core workflow, binary resolution, chaining rules, and the most-used commands, adding clearly signaled one-level-deep pointers.
Trim explanations of shell basics Claude already knows (e.g., "Chain commands with && … the chain stops on first error") down to the tool-specific when-to-chain guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The bulk is tight, tool-specific command syntax Claude cannot infer, but the Tips section restates ~13 points already covered (map before interacting, fill vs type, eval escape hatch), `vibium screenshot` appears in two command sections, Common Patterns repeats Core Workflow, and shell basics like "&& … stops on first error" are over-explained — noticeably more than the minor trimming of level 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every command has full syntax with flags, and worked examples (login with `storage -o auth.json`, form fill → `wait url "/dashboard"` → screenshot, heredoc `eval --stdin`, `record start --video`) are copy-paste ready and cover the common cases, matching the fully-executable top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Core Workflow (navigate → map → interact → re-map), Ref Lifecycle invalidation rules, readiness feedback loop ("If installation is missing, use the reported vibium install command and retry"), and `diff map`/`check` verification give clear sequences with most checkpoints — but validation lives in scattered sections rather than embedded in the main workflows, and flows like upload and dialogs have no verification, falling short of level 5's explicit validate-fix-retry loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Headers and sectioning are good, but there are no bundle files: a ~150-line command catalog, touch/mouse primitives, and recording internals all live inline in a ~480-line SKILL.md, matching anchor 3's "content that should be separate is inline" rather than level 4's appropriately split layout; it stays above level 2 because structure and navigation are present. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |